Global Weather Watch

—

Niño 3.4, weekly —°C OISST v2.1 — vs prior week
Niño 1+2, weekly —°C OISST v2.1 — vs prior week
Niño 3.4, monthly —°C OISST v2.1 — vs prior month
ONI —°C ERSSTv6, 3-month mean — vs prior season
RONI —°C Relative ERSSTv6, 3-month — vs prior season
SOI, 3-month —σ CPC standardized units — vs prior month

2026 hurricanes and typhoons: one paper per storm

Research papers on every 2026 storm that reached hurricane or typhoon strength in the Atlantic, eastern and central Pacific and western Pacific, written newest first in batches of five. Built from IBTrACS tracks, NOAA OISST and the forecast centres' own analyses; provisional until the official reports.

ONI and RONI: 2026 against the three strongest events

Solid lines: Oceanic Niño Index (ONI; ERSSTv6 Niño 3.4, 3-month running mean, centred base periods). Dashed lines: Relative ONI (RONI; Niño 3.4 minus the 20°N–20°S tropical mean, rescaled), NOAA's official index since 1 Feb 2026. Aligned from DJF of each onset year; 2026 is the thick blue line.

How each event developed

How each event developed
1982–831997–982015–162026
Start (ONI, DJF)−0.1, neutral−0.4, weak La Niña+0.7, already warm after the 2014 false start−0.4, weak La Niña
By JAS (ONI)+1.0, slow+1.8, fast+1.7, steady+2.2, fastest
Peak ONI+2.1 (DJF)+2.4 (NDJ)+2.6 (NDJ), highest ONI on recordStill rising; peaks usually Nov–Jan
Start (RONI, DJF)+0.11, neutral−0.21, neutral+0.54, already at the El Niño threshold−0.91, weak La Niña
By JAS (RONI)+1.14 (rise +1.03)+1.84 (rise +2.05), highest at this stage+1.54 (rise +1.00)+1.69 (rise +2.60), largest rise
Peak RONI+2.40 (DJF), highest of the three on RONI+2.28 (NDJ)+2.25 (NDJ); the ONI–RONI gap shows much of 2015's ONI was tropics-wide warmthStill rising. CPC forecast: 54% (SON), 83% (OND), 70% (NDJ) chance of RONI ≥ +2.5, a historic event
Niño 1+2 max (monthly)+4.0, late (Jun 1983)+3.7 (Nov)+2.5 (Jul)+4.7 (Sep), record
Subsurface heat max—+2.56 (Oct)+1.97 (Aug)+3.39 (Sep), record
PDO (Sep)+0.5+1.8+1.0−1.55
How it unfoldedUnforecast; grew slowly, then surged in autumn and lingered off South America into mid-1983. El Chichón's volcanic haze confused satellite readings.Strong spring wind bursts sent huge Kelvin waves east; a classic east-based event that peaked in December and collapsed into La Niña by mid-1998.Began warm, grew steadily and peaked in the central Pacific with weaker coastal warming; Southern California's winter was drier than expected.Explosive spring–summer growth from La Niña, record coastal and subsurface warmth, strong atmospheric coupling (3-month SOI −1.8), but a negative PDO and a much warmer background ocean.
Marine lifeGalápagos corals lost about 95% of their living tissue. Galápagos penguins fell 77% and flightless cormorants 49%.The first global coral bleaching on record killed about 16% of the world's reefs in nine months. Galápagos penguins fell 65%. California's market squid catch collapsed from 70,257 t (1997) to under 3,000 t (1998).Overlapped the 2014–16 "Blob" marine heatwave, so effects are shared. A record toxic algal bloom delayed West Coast Dungeness crab seasons; 8,112 starving California sea lion pups stranded (2013–16). In 2016 fewer than 10% of Great Barrier Reef reefs escaped bleaching.Phytoplankton down in the central equatorial Pacific (NASA PACE, June). Peru's anchoveta fishery repeatedly suspended. Galápagos coral heat stress peaked at 24.6 °C-weeks in May and was still 12.1 on 15 Oct, well above the 8 at which NOAA warns of severe bleaching.
Did it recover?Slowly and only in part. By 2004 the Galápagos penguins were still below half their pre-1982 number. Some Galápagos reefs have regrown; others were lost and have not come back.Fish fast, the rest slowly. In the cool La Niña of 1999 the squid catch hit a record 90,322 t, more than 30 times 1998's. The penguins, hit twice, stayed below half their pre-1982 number.NOAA closed the California sea lion mortality event at the end of September 2016. The longer-term effects are hard to separate from the "Blob".Too early to say. Phytoplankton often rebounds after El Niño; after 1997–98 the La Niña brought a large eastern Pacific bloom.
Southern CaliforniaVery wet: 33.19 in at Downtown LA (234% of normal). January–March 1983 storms destroyed a third to half of the Santa Monica Pier, and mudslides closed Pacific Coast Highway.Very wet: 30.57 in (215%). December 1997 mudflows ran through Laguna Beach; warm water emptied the squid grounds.Dry: 6.88 in (48%) despite the record ONI. The ocean effects (starving sea lion pups, toxic algae) were bigger than the rain.Winter rain has not started. Sea level at Los Angeles has run about 1 ft above the tide tables since 13 Oct (Kelvin wave plus marine heatwave). Rain outlook: see the PDO card below.

Rain: Downtown LA water year (Oct–Sep), % of the 1991–2020 normal of 14.2 in (RCC-ACIS). Marine-life sources: Glynn et al. 2018, Marine Pollution Bulletin 133 (Galápagos corals); Valle et al. 1987, Condor 89 (1982–83 penguins and cormorants); Vargas et al. 2006, Biological Conservation (penguins 1997–98 and 2004); Wilkinson (ed.), Status of Coral Reefs of the World: 2000; CalCOFI Reports 40 and 41 (squid catches 1998–99); NOAA Fisheries (2013–16 sea lion mortality event; 2014–16 marine heatwave); Hughes et al. 2018, Nature (Great Barrier Reef); NASA PACE (Aug 2026); NOAA Coral Reef Watch (Galápagos station). Santa Monica Pier: Santa Monica Daily Press. 2026 sea level: NOAA CO-OPS Los Angeles.

ENSO outlook: official CPC and IRI model-based probabilities

Chance (%) of each ENSO category for each 3-month target season. Rows are matched by target season, not by position; "—" means that source has no forecast for that season. Each value is a seasonal probability, not monthly odds. Issued: CPC — · IRI —.

ENSO outlook: official CPC and IRI model-based probabilities

CPC official: consensus of NOAA CPC forecasters (with IRI), verified against the relative Niño 3.4 index (RONI); categories are ±0.5 °C, and the "≥ +1.5 °C" column is the chance of a strong or very strong El Niño. CPC also puts the chance of a historic event (RONI ≥ +2.5 °C) at 83% for Oct–Dec. IRI objective: computed by regression from the model plume below, with no forecaster judgement, using the traditional Niño 3.4 anomaly (OISST, 1991–2020). The two use different indices, so differences of a few points are expected. Sources: CPC strength probabilities, CPC ENSO discussion, IRI ENSO forecast.

CPC El Niño strength detail

CPC official El Niño strength probabilities by target season

Issued by NOAA CPC on —, for the target seasons listed. Unconditional probabilities: each value is the chance of that strength out of all outcomes, not the chance given that El Niño occurs. The four strengths add up to CPC's El Niño probability, and the grey remainder (Neutral or La Niña) brings each bar to 100%. Strength uses the 3-month RONI: weak +0.5 to +1.0 °C, moderate +1.0 to +1.5, strong +1.5 to +2.0, very strong ≥ +2.0.

CPC official El Niño strength probabilities by target season

Source: Official NOAA CPC ENSO Strength Probabilities (numeric table). Percentages are CPC's own rounded values.

Model detail

Model plume: Niño 3.4 SST anomaly forecasts (°C)

IRI/CCSR plume issued October 2026: 27 models (16 dynamical, 11 statistical). Thin lines are single models; the shaded band is their full range. These are temperature-anomaly forecasts, not probabilities: IRI uses them to compute its objective probabilities above, but the plume is not another set of official CPC probabilities. Values are traditional Niño 3.4 anomalies (OISST v2.1, 1991–2020 base), which run warmer than RONI.

* Observed: IRI's July–September and September values. Plume values are read from IRI's published figure geometry (the data tables are not public) and cross-checked so the mean of the single models reproduces IRI's plotted average to ±0.01 °C.

The wild card: a strong El Niño meets a negative PDO

What the PDO is. The Pacific Decadal Oscillation describes the North Pacific's slow temperature pattern. In its positive phase the water along North America is warm and the central North Pacific cool; in its negative phase the reverse. It shifts over years to decades, while ENSO shifts over months. In September 2026 the PDO was −1.55, strongly negative. Among El Niño winters since 1951, only 2023–24 had a lower PDO. In 1982, 1997 and 2015 it was positive (+0.5, +1.8, +1.0).

Why it could matter. El Niño's heat in the tropics strengthens the subtropical jet stream and deepens the Aleutian Low in the Gulf of Alaska. That steers storms into California. A positive PDO works in the same direction. A negative PDO pushes the other way: it favours high pressure over the northeast Pacific, the blocking "ridge" that diverts storms north to Canada and leaves California dry. So the two patterns are pulling in opposite directions this winter.

What history actually shows. The record is more reassuring than the theory. In Downtown Los Angeles, all four El Niño winters with a negative PDO were wetter than normal, including 2023–24 (PDO −1.7, rain 156% of normal). The two driest strong El Niño winters, 2015–16 (48%) and 1986–87 (40%), both had a positive PDO. The PDO sign alone has not decided Los Angeles rainfall.

Why it is still the wild card. No winter on record combines an El Niño this strong (ONI above +2) with a PDO this negative, so there is no true analogue. Ten winters are too few to rule anything out. And the September PNA was −0.64, the opposite of the usual El Niño pattern. A North Pacific ridge has not yet given way to the deep Aleutian Low that brings storms south.

Blob watch: North Pacific marine heatwaves vs 2014–16

Status from NOAA's California Current Marine Heatwave Tracker (update of 30 Sep 2026, still the latest as of 23 Oct) and NOAA's C-COAST assessment (25 Sep 2026); PDO from NOAA NCEI (ERSSTv5). Reviewed every Friday. Marine heatwave = sea-surface temperature above the 90th percentile for the date, sustained over a large area.

Blob watch: North Pacific marine heatwaves vs 2014–16
2014–16 "Blob"Now (Oct 2026)
SizeBasin-scale; NOAA calls it unique in its record. It persisted until mid-2016.Two separate heatwaves, neither described by NOAA as Blob-sized.
How longMore than 700 continuous days of high temperatures in the California Current (back-to-back events, 2014–16).About 17 months: the California heatwave (NOAA's NEP25A) has been tracked since May 2025.
Southern CaliforniaWarm water from 2014 onward.Heatwave affecting central and southern California, expanding and intensifying in recent weeks; NOAA says late-September warming may be partly El Niño-driven. Santa Monica Bay buoy: about 74°F on 25 Aug, nearly 6°F above its 26-year average for the date; 47 daily records there in 2026 (Scripps CDIP, via Surfer, 2 Sep).
Washington to N. CaliforniaWarm along the whole coast.Average to slightly above; only small, short-lived patches.
Gulf of AlaskaThe Blob's core, built under a ridge that persisted through the 2013–14 and 2014–15 winters.Offshore heatwave (NEP26A) since May 2026, growing in area and intensity, not yet reaching the coast. Little stored subsurface heat, since winter 2025–26 brought no major warm anomalies there (NOAA PSL).
Steering patternPersistent ridge off the West Coast for months.Not persistent: ridge 5–8 Oct, trough 10–11 Oct (500 hPa, ridge watch on this dashboard).
PDO (Sep)+0.76 (2014), +0.97 (2015)−1.55, the opposite sign
Outlook—NOAA: 80–100% chance of marine heatwave conditions off California through the end of 2026, 30–70% off Oregon and Washington. The concern is how long the heat lasts rather than further intensification.
WildlifeMass die-offs: about 62,000 common murre carcasses washed ashore and more than half of Alaska's roughly 8 million murres disappeared (the toll may have reached 1 million birds); thousands of starving sea lion pups stranded.No similar widespread die-off documented as of early July 2026 (Desert Sun, citing NOAA).
El NiñoArrived in 2015 on top of the Blob, then peaked at ONI +2.6.Already near-record (JAS ONI +2.16), with Kelvin waves raising LA sea level about 1 ft.

Sources: NOAA IEA California Current Marine Heatwave Tracker; NOAA IEA C-COAST (25 Sep 2026); Surfer (2 Sep 2026, Scripps CDIP buoys); Desert Sun via AOL (6 Jul 2026, murre and sea lion figures from NOAA); NOAA PSL, "Severity and persistence of Northeast Pacific marine heatwaves vary by season" (Jul 2026); Bond et al. 2015, Geophysical Research Letters 42 (causes of the 2014 warm anomaly); NOAA NCEI PDO; The Inertia (3 Oct 2025, citing NOAA, on the 2025 heatwave).

Weekly Niño 3.4 and Niño 1+2 since 2025

OISST v2.1 weekly anomalies, 1991–2020 base. The dashed line marks the highest weekly Niño 3.4 value before 2026.

SOI 3-month mean against the same analogues

3-month centred mean of CPC's standardized Tahiti minus Darwin SOI, in CPC units (multiply by 10 for the BOM scale). Negative values are El Niño-like.

Blob and El Niño: 2013–16 against 2024–26

Monthly sea-surface temperature anomaly, °C vs 1991–2020 (NOAA ERSSTv5, box means), and the ONI. Aligned so the El Niño years line up: 2015 with 2026, so the x-axis starts in January 2013 and January 2024.

Northeast Pacific "Blob" box, 40–50°N, 150–135°W

Off Southern California, 30–36°N, 124–118°W

El Niño: ONI (3-month Niño 3.4)

The Blob box is the region Bond et al. (2015) used for the 2014 warm anomaly. Months not yet published are left blank.